UST lending remains relatively low, despite excellent APR. Part of the reason is probably down to the low collateral factor, compare to other stablecoins.
I propose that this should be re-assessed and brought into line with other stablecoins. UST have established themselves as a legitimate stablecoin provider (in the top 20 cryptocurrencies), so I see no extra risk when compared to others.
Risk control needs to be very cautious. Considering that in the previous 519 incident, the price of UST dropped by more than 10%, they thought that 10% increase on Collateral Factor was already relatively high, and if the increase is too high, it will be very difficult to reduce it later.
I have a problem.
1 I suplied 11k ust
2 I take back 5k ust from 11k ust
3 After that My deposit in suply change from 6075 to 5951ust for 2 days and now 5938 ust
First i supply 11k ust and then i withdraw 5k so i have in supply about 6075 ust in wing finance after that for 2 day my sypply down to 5938 ust . Now it grow up to 5950.
5938UST-> 5950 UST is correct, your supply balance was increasing since Supply APR.
It is strange that your supply balance from 6075 ust to 5938 UST, have you withdrawn again?
I’m Yuki, the Admin of Wing DAO, please ask me for help in Wing DAO TG group. It is hard to find the reason from what your supplied messages.
I agree with that. UST has a high supply APR of 38% but the amount of total supply is a little bit low. Increasing the Collateral Factor can encourage people to supply and collateral UST so borrow other assets.
I think we should re-evaluate the collateral factor of UST, if there is a chance to increase it, more UST holders will be happy to supply their UST in Ethereum Flash Pool and borrow other assets. There will be more Wing users. That’s good!
I can understand that on May 19, the price of UST dragged the anchor, and the Wing Risk Control department was worried about the risk of UST, but now that the ecology of UST is so prosperous, we should make appropriate changes!